Improving Outcome-Based Effectiveness Assessments of Protected and Conserved Areas

Overview

The need for improved PCA effectiveness assessments

Over the past two decades, there has been a growing global interest in understanding and demonstrating the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) which collectively are referred to as protected and conserved areas (PCAs). The need to go beyond coverage targets and understand whether PCAs are delivering conservation outcomes was already recognized in the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Aichi Target 11, which highlighted that PCAs must be “effectively and equitably managed” (CBD 2011). The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework Target 3 reinforced this commitment, calling for at least 30% of the planet to be “effectively conserved and managed” by 2030, through systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (CBD 2022). 

Citation

Nick Salafsky, Paola Mejía Cortez, Gemma Barr, Andrea Barrero, Oliver Chassot, Carly Cook, Marta Díaz, James Fitzsimons, Tobias Garstecki, Jonas Geldmann, Camila Germana, Cleo Graf, Kirsten Grourud-Colvert, Natalie Hayward, Marc Hockings, Robyn L. Irvine, Mariano de la Maza, Mariana Méndez, John Morrison, Yves Olatoundji, Mohammad Khalid Sayeed Pasha, Kelly Raymond, Maximiliano Sepúlveda, Matti Tapaninen, Marcela Torres Hinojosa, Katia Torres Ribeiro, Edgar Vicuña Miñano, James Watson, Sue Wells (2026). Improving Outcome-Based Effectiveness Assessments of Protected and Conserved Areas: Principles and Practices. IUCN WCPA Issues Paper Series No. 09.