Building towards the marine conservation end-game: consolidating the role of MPAs in a future ocean

Published Article

Global

Publication date: September 6, 2016

View resource

Marine conservation progress cannot rely solely on spatial extent. This paper advocates for clear definitions, ecological effectiveness, equity, and biodiversity representation, ensuring protected areas deliver real conservation outcomes and ecosystem services within a wider spatial framework.

Subject Tags

  • Marine protected areas
  • Conservation Planning
  • Coastal

Abstract

Marine conservation progress is often measured by spatial extent, but this simplistic metric overlooks critical factors such as ecological effectiveness, biodiversity, connectivity, and equitable outcomes. This paper calls for clearer definitions of what counts as protection, distinguishing non-extractive areas like no-take reserves from extractive zones, and ensuring sites are ecologically effective and equitably managed. Spatial coverage alone is insufficient; conservation efforts must prioritize biodiversity and ecosystem services through well-defined metrics and strategic site selection. By adopting robust criteria for assessing progress and setting future targets, marine conservation can better halt biodiversity loss, enhance ecosystem services, and integrate protected spaces within a broader spatial framework for lasting ocean health.

Citation

D. Spalding, M., Meliane, I., J. Bennett, N., Dearden, P., G. Patil, P. and D. Brumbaugh, R., 2016. Building towards the marine conservation end‐game: Consolidating the role of MPAs in a future ocean. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems26, pp.185-199.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.2686

 

Media Contacts

  • The Nature Conservancy