Tamm review: A meta-analysis of thinning, prescribed fire, and wildfire effects on subsequent wildfire severity in conifer dominated forests of the Western US
A meta-analysis of U.S. West studies shows that prescribed burning and thinning with burning reduce wildfire severity by 62–72%. Effectiveness declines over time but remains high across forest types and weather. Surface fuel treatment is key to mitigating wildfire impacts.
Subject Tags
- Land management
- Climate resilience
- Forest
Abstract
Increased understanding of how mechanical thinning, prescribed burning, and wildfire affect subsequent wildfire severity is urgently needed as people and forests face a growing wildfire crisis. In response, we reviewed scientific literature for the US West and completed a meta-analysis that answered three questions: (1) How much do treatments reduce wildfire severity within treated areas? (2) How do the effects vary with treatment type, treatment age, and forest type? (3) How does fire weather moderate the effects of treatments? We found overwhelming evidence that mechanical thinning with prescribed burning, mechanical thinning with pile burning, and prescribed burning only are effective at reducing subsequent wildfire severity, resulting in reductions in severity between 62% and 72% relative to untreated areas. In comparison, thinning only was less effective – underscoring the importance of treating surface fuels when mitigating wildfire severity is the management goal. The efficacy of these treatments did not vary among forest types assessed in this study and was high across a range of fire weather conditions. Prior wildfire had more complex impacts on subsequent wildfire severity, which varied with forest type and initial wildfire severity. Across treatment types, we found that effectiveness of treatments declined over time, with the mean reduction in wildfire severity decreasing more than twofold when wildfire occurred greater than 10 years after initial treatment. Our meta-analysis provides up-to-date information on the extent to which active forest management reduces wildfire severity and facilitates better outcomes for people and forests during future wildfire events.
Citation
Davis, K.T., Peeler, J., Fargione, J., Haugo, R.D., Metlen, K.L., Robles, M.D. and Woolley, T., 2024. Tamm review: A meta-analysis of thinning, prescribed fire, and wildfire effects on subsequent wildfire severity in conifer dominated forests of the Western US. Forest Ecology and Management, 561, p.121885.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272400197X
Media Contacts
-
Joseph E. Fargione
Director of Science, North America
The Nature Conservancy
Email: jfargione@tnc.org -
Marcos Robles
Lead Scientist, Arizona
The Nature Conservancy
Email: mrobles@tnc.org -
Travis Woolley
Forest Ecologist
The Nature Conservancy
Email: twoolley@tnc.org