Current inequality and future potential of U.S. urban tree cover for reducing heat-related health impacts

Published Article

United States

Publication date: April 8, 2024

View resource

Urban heat impacts vary by race; white neighborhoods benefit more from tree cover, reducing deaths and energy use. Planting 1.2B trees could cut heat-related deaths, emissions and costs, with highest ROI in underserved POC areas. Total benefits estimated at $9.6B, guiding equitable climate action.

Subject Tags

  • Climate adaptation
  • Equitable conservation

Abstract

Excessive heat is a major and growing risk for urban residents. Here, we estimate the inequality in summertime heat-related mortality, morbidity and electricity consumption across 5,723 U.S. municipalities and other places, housing 180 million people during the 2020 census. On average, trees in majority non-Hispanic white neighborhoods cool the air by 0.19 ± 0.05 °C more than in POC neighborhoods, leading annually to trees in white neighborhoods helping prevent 190 ± 139 more deaths, 30,131 ± 10,406 more doctors’ visits and 1.4 ± 0.5 terawatt-hours (TWhr) more electricity consumption than in POC neighborhoods. We estimate that an ambitious reforestation program would require 1.2 billion trees and reduce population-weighted average summer temperatures by an additional 0.38 ± 0.01 °C. This temperature reduction would reduce annual heat-related mortality by an additional 464 ± 89 people, annual heat-related morbidity by 80,785 ± 6,110 cases and annual electricity consumption by 4.3 ± 0.2 TWhr while increasing annual carbon sequestration in trees by 23.7 ± 1.2 MtCO2e yr−1 and decreasing annual electricity-related GHG emissions by 2.1 ± 0.2 MtCO2e yr−1. The total economic value of these benefits, including the value of carbon sequestration and avoided emissions, would be USD $9.6 ± $0.5 billion, although in many neighborhoods the cost of planting and maintaining trees to achieve this increased tree cover would exceed these benefits. The exception is areas that currently have less tree cover, often the majority POC, which tend to have a relatively high return on investment from tree planting.

Citation

McDonald, R.I., Biswas, T., Chakraborty, T.C., Kroeger, T., Cook-Patton, S.C. and Fargione, J.E., 2024. Current inequality and future potential of US urban tree cover for reducing heat-related health impacts. npj Urban Sustainability, 4(1), p.18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-024-00150-3

TNC Authors

  • Robert McDonald
    Lead Scientist, Nature-based Solutions
    The Nature Conservancy
    Email: rob_mcdonald@tnc.org

  • Susan Cook-Patton
    Lead Reforestation Scientist
    The Nature Conservancy
    Email: susan.cook-patton@tnc.org

  • Joe Fargione
    Director of Science, North America Region
    The Nature Conservancy
    Email: jfargione@tnc.org