In some ways, the name LANDFIRE can be misleading. The suite of tools, models and digital map layers -- the first complete, nationally consistent collection of resources with an ecological foundation -- are valuable resources for those working on fuels and fire-related land management issues, scenario planning and budgeting, of course. However, LANDFIRE models and spatial layers have been used in numerous and varied conservation applications that extend way "beyond fire," as we like to say.
Because LANDFIRE has been around since 2004, keeping track of the thousands of ways our data and tools are being used is impossible.
This page: occasionally, we interview LANDFIRE users and invite them to tell us about their work -- a few of those interviews follow. Our TNC team also offers a few reports and case studies that we think you'll be interested in.
In the right column on this page, "Related Resources," click on links to the Web-Hosted Application Map and the WHAM! Apps pdf - they point you to 131 LANDFIRE applications that you can review via interactive map and a PDF table of the stories that are called out on the WHAM!
Summary Stories, a selection of thumbnail reports that are developed according to a short template that include citations, abstracts, maps, and photos.
Future Forest Dynamics Across the US: Jennifer Costanza
Jen Costanza is a landscape ecologist with research interests in the ecological effects of global change, land change modeling and landscape conservation. Her Ph.D. in ecology was awarded from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; she is a Research Assistant Professor at North Carolina State University.
Jen’s current research involves response to changes in climate, disturbances, land use and land management. She is working to produce future projections of forest conditions for the
Forest Service’s Resources Planning Act (RPA) Assessment. Additional research spans landscape ecology and conservation biology, including modeling wildlife habitat connectivity in the southeastern U.S., simulating landscape dynamics under scenarios of bioenergy production in North Carolina, and mapping threats to ecosystems in the
North American Coastal Plain – the world’s newest global biodiversity hotspot.
Maps, Models, Metrics: Applied Conservation’s Greg Low
Greg Low and partner
Henry Little established
Applied Conservation LLC in 2011. The company provides consulting and facilitation services to public agencies, nonprofit conservation organizations, private landowners, and other partners in conservation action planning, forecasting, implementation, environmental dashboards, and organizational development in landscapes ranging from 50,000 to over 1,000,000 acres.
Applied Conservation uses LANDFIRE products as a foundation for the process known as
Landscape Conservation Forecasting. This interview reveals the many ways of working and methods for analysis that LANDFIRE supports.
Updating LANDFIRE Fuel Grids Using MTBS Fire Severity Data
The LF Program provides data version updates in two-year increments. However, due to the effort involved in the update process, the data might not be available for two or three years. What about fires in the “off” years? In response to that data need, Anthony Beauchaine, U.S. Forest Service, and LF’s own Kori Blankenship, TNC, found a solution by replicating the LF update process using available Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) data. In a LF Product Application Summary, the duo describe how they developed a scalable process that enables natural resource managers to make local updates to LF fuels data between official LF updates.
Jim Smith, LANDFIRE Project Lead
Data Application blogs
-- Check out this six-part series! "More Than a Catchy Number," "Overall Agreement," "Contingency Table/Error Matrix," "Understanding the Usability of a Map," "Local vs. Non-local Accuracy," and "LANDFIRE Agreement Results," in which I examine spatial data with a keen eye and offer important insight and advice. Think wine, cross-country road trips, map disagreement, getting along with each other and more.
Kori Blankenship, Fire Ecologist
Call me a shameless self-promoter, but I’d like to begin my picks this month with the new guide
Modifying LANDFIRE Geospatial Data for Local Applications
written by Don Helmbrecht and me. The guide provides an easy-to-understand introduction to each of the LANDFIRE products, explains where and how to look for common problems with the data and offers guidance on how to complete common modification tasks. This guide is an excellent resource for anyone working with LANDFIRE data, but will be especially helpful to users who need to refine the data for local application. Check it out and
send us your feedback.
The past year has been all about BpS review so for my second pick, I like a paper that demonstrates the utility of BpS-like models:
The economics of fuel management: Wildfire, invasive plants, and the dynamics of sagebrush rangelands in the western United States
. The goal of this paper, by Michael Taylor and others (2013), is to determine if fuel treatments in sagebrush are cost effective. They answer this question with the help of state-and-transition models that are parameterized using LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings models. The upshot…treatments are cost effective in healthy sagebrush states, but not in degraded or invaded states. A key caveat is that this study measured economic efficiency in terms of wildfire suppression cost savings. The value of ecosystem goods and services were not included in the model.
Jeannie Patton, Communications Lead
In 2016, TNC-LANDFIRE hosted
covering everything from BpS review, to adapting data for local use, to looking at why and how LANDFIRE works and why it matters ... .and more. The best way to see what matters in your landscape and region, is to look at the titles and resources (pdf's, videos, papers) and pick the ones that matter to you the most.
Start with our webinar list on the Gateway.
Being a born and raised westerner (Colorado), I've always been interested in the iconic coyote -- trickster, wisdom-carrier, fool. I was interested, therefore, to see a LANDFIRE-related coyote study,
Environmental factors influencing the occurrence of coyotes and conflicts in urban areas
, by Posessel, Gese and Young. The authors conducted a survey of 105 urban areas for which they requested information about coyotes and human-coyote conflicts. The results were analyzed (data on human population size, geographic region, land cover, housing density, and precipitation) by using LANDFIRE data for the land cover analysis.
I've said it before, but the application story about
Cherokee National Forest Collaborative
is a case study of challenges overcome, successful collaboration, and a plan for restoration that brought a disparate group of stake-holders together in unprecedented -- some would say miraculous -- cooperation.
Randy Swaty, Ecologist
Haley Michael, Ron Deckert, Catherine Gehring and I recently published a paper that's worth your attention, Mapping the potential mycorrhizal associations of the conterminous United States of America
. Mycorrhizae are symbiotic relationships between soil fungi and many plants; they are key to ecosystem function - and even survival - for some plants. Using literature, we assigned a mycorrhizal label to each of the 1-8 dominant plants that occur in each Biophysical Setting description. We consolidated those labels to attribute each BpS with a mycorrhizal community to generate the maps in the paper. Without the LANDFIRE BpS descriptions and spatial data this research would not have been possible.
As the wildfire season winds down for at least parts of the United States (as of this writing, fires still burned in CA, ID, AZ, NC and AL/GA border
), I think of risks to lives and property, suppression costs and how to reduce risk. A robust paper by Joe Scott et al.
Examining alternative fuel management strategies and the relative contribution of National Forest System land to wildfire risk to adjacent homes – A pilot assessment on the Sierra National Forest, California, USA
, uses the LANDFIRE Landscape Files (includes terrain, tree canopy and surface fuels data), simulation modeling and risk analysis to explore the potential risk abatement of fuels treatments. I will point to one key message: landscape-scale assessments enabled by LANDFIRE and other large datasets are key to prioritizing fuel treatment strategies.
William Elliot and colleagues presented a paper, Combining Fire and Erosion Modeling to Target Forest Management Activities,
that uses fire and erosion modeling to target forest restoration. Working in California, authors estimated fire risk and post-fire erosion from a target watershed. Erosion was mapped per hillslope, providing guidance for where restoration could be focused. It is an elegant approach that used LANDFIRE fuels, Existing Vegetation Type and Existing Vegetation Cover data.
Kim Hall, Climate Change Ecologist
LANDFIRE vegetation cover maps play an important supporting role in a recent evaluation of how avian malaria and climate change may interact to further reduce future ranges for Hawaiian forest birds.
In a study by Fortini et al
. (USGS, USFWS), LANDFIRE EVT were used to evaluate habitat availability under future climate conditions within ranges estimated from species distribution models.
Bet-hedging dry-forest resilience to climate-change threats in the western USA based on historical forest structure
. My work focuses on evaluating climate change impacts, and updating conservation strategies to reduce climate-related risks. So, I was particularly interested in a recent paper by Baker and Williams in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
(2015) that draws upon LANDFIRE maps of ponderosa pine and dry mixed conifer forest. This paper provides interesting food for thought related to the role of small trees in conferring resilience to fire, insects, and drought. Thinking through all of these interactions can help us update forest management for climate change.
In another avian application
, Gnass Giese et al. used LANDFIRE EVT to evaluate whether bird distributions across a wide range of sites in the Great Lakes region show a “human footprint.” The team demonstrates how bird survey data and land use information can be crafted into a bird-based index of ecological condition for the region, noting that while other datasets mapped vegetation at finer resolution.
Sarah Hagen, Spatial Analyst
To quantify and identify priority areas for prescribed fire, the
Wisconsin Fire Needs Assessment
combines the information for fire dependent vegetation with additional spatial data sets to assess the benefits, effort, and challenges associated with using prescribed fire. LF data were used because they include both public and private lands; they are publicly available, making the methods easy to replicate for other states; and the assessment can be updated with future versions of LF data. Vegetation descriptions that included historical mean fire return intervals were an important part of the analysis.
Illinois Fire Council developed the state's fire needs assessment
to promote and expand the use of prescribed fire. This is the first systematic report in Illinois to document the number of acres burned annually and identify how many need to burn in order to promote ecosystem health. It provides a call to action for land managers, legislators and the general public. Products used: BpS, EVT, and MFRI were foundational resources.
Watch the webinar video.