usa map

In some ways, the name LANDFIRE can be misleading. The suite of tools, models and digital map layers -- the first complete, nationally consistent collection of resources with an ecological foundation -- are valuable resources for those working on fuels and fire-related land management issues, scenario planning and budgeting, of course. However, LANDFIRE models and spatial layers have been used in numerous and varied conservation applications that extend way "beyond fire," as we like to say.


Site Resources

Because LANDFIRE has been around since 2004, keeping track of the thousands of ways our data and tools are being used is impossible.  

  • This page - TNC's LANDFIRE Team selects a few reports and case studies that we like.
  • Next page: Summary Stories, a selection of thumbnail reports that include citations, abstracts, maps, and photos.


Featured Application

Updating the Fire Return Intervals in the Illinois Fire Needs Assessment In her report "GIS/Baseline Data Processing for IL Fire Needs Assessment," LANDFIRE's Sarah Hagen outlines the process that was used along with lessons learned and links to YouTube videos. Click here for Assessment report itself. Watch the webinar video.

Team Picks  

Jim photo Jim Smith, LANDFIRE Project Lead

Scientists in North Carolina produced two interesting papers that utilized LANDFIRE Program products. In Bioenergy Production and Forest Landscape Change in the Southeastern United States, Jen Costanza, Bob Abt, Alexa McKerrow and Jaime Collazo incorporated LANDFIRE models and spatial data into an simulation analysis of the impact of five different wood production scenarios on landscape change in the Southeastern United states between 2010 and 2050. 

Projected gains and losses of wildlife habitat from bioenergy-induced landscape change. Led by Nathan Tarr and Matthew Rubino, authors examined the impact of the different wood production scenarios on wildlife habit by using LANDFIRE Succession Class datasets.

Data Application blogs -- Check out this four-part series! "More Than a Catchy Number," "Overall Agreement," "Contingency Table/Error Matrix," and Understanding the Usability of a Map," in which I examine spatial data with a keen eye and offer important insight and advice. Think wine, cross-country road trips, map disagreement and more.
Kori Blankenship, Fire Ecologist
Kori May 2014 dodged.jpgCall me a shameless self-promoter, but I’d like to begin my picks this month with the new guide Modifying LANDFIRE Geospatial Data for Local Applications written by Don Helmbrecht and me. The guide provides an easy-to-understand introduction to each of the LANDFIRE products, explains where and how to look for common problems with the data and offers guidance on how to complete common modification tasks. This guide is an excellent resource for anyone working with LANDFIRE data, but will be especially helpful to users who need to refine the data for local application. Check it out and send us your feedback.

The past year has been all about BpS review so for my second pick, I like a paper that demonstrates the utility of BpS-like models: The economics of fuel management: Wildfire, invasive plants, and the dynamics of sagebrush rangelands in the western United States. The goal of this paper, by Michael Taylor and others (2013), is to determine if fuel treatments in sagebrush are cost effective. They answer this question with the help of state-and-transition models that are parameterized using LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings models. The upshot…treatments are cost effective in healthy sagebrush states, but not in degraded or invaded states. A key caveat is that this study measured economic efficiency in terms of wildfire suppression cost savings. The value of ecosystem goods and services were not included in the model.
Jeannie Patton, Communications Lead 

In 2016, TNC-LANDFIRE hosted 16 webinars covering everything from BpS review, to adapting data for local use, to looking at why and how LANDFIRE works and why it matters ... .and more. The best way to see what matters in your landscape and region, is to look at the titles and resources (pdf's, videos, papers) and pick the ones that matter to you the most. Start with our webinar list on the Gateway.
Being a born and raised westerner (Colorado), I've always been interested in the iconic coyote -- trickster, widsom-carrier, fool. I was interested, therefore, to see a LANDFIRE-related coyote study, Environmental factors influencing the occurrence of coyotes and conflicts in urban areas, by Posessel, Gese and Young. The authors conducted a survey of 105 urban areas for which they requested information about coyotes and human-coyote conflicts. The results were analyzed (data on human population size, geographic region, land cover, housing density, and precipitation) by using LANDFIRE data for the land cover analysis.
I've said it before, but the application story about Cherokee National Forest Collaborative  is a case study of challenges overcome, successful collaboration,  and a plan for restoration that brought a disparate group of stake-holders together in unprecedented -- some would say miraculous -- cooperation. 
Randy Swaty, Ecologist
Randy winter.jpgPrioritizing what to do where and when is a major challenge for land managers. The Nature Conservancy and Hiawatha National Forest are working to identify opportunities to both restore fire-dependent ecosystems and reduce wildfire risk in and around the Wildland Urban Interface. To do this assessment the team is using existing data from the Hiawatha and locally reviewed and adjusted LF BpS, S-Class and FRCC datasets.
Food storage and LANDFIRE? Not your typical coupling, but recently Howey and Frederick (2016) published a paper, Immovable food storage facilities, knowledge, and landscape in non-sedentary societies: Perspectives from northern Michigan that does just that. Using the LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings (BpSs) data as context, the authors explored late Precontact (ca. AD 1000/110) food storage by hunter-gatherer societies in northern Michigan.
William Elliot and colleagues presented a paper, Combining Fire and Erosion Modeling to Target Forest Management Activities, that uses fire and erosion modeling to target forest restoration. Working in California, authors estimated fire risk and post-fire erosion from a target watershed.  Erosion was mapped per hillslope, providing guidance for where restoration could be focused.  It is an elegant approach that used LANDFIRE fuels, Existing Vegetation Type and Existing Vegetation Cover data. 
Kim Hall photo Kim Hall, Climate Change Ecologist
LANDFIRE vegetation cover maps play an important supporting role in a recent evaluation of how avian malaria and climate change may interact to further reduce future ranges for Hawaiian forest birds. In a study by Fortini et al. (USGS, USFWS), LANDFIRE EVT were used to evaluate habitat availability under future climate conditions within ranges estimated from species distribution models.
Bet-hedging dry-forest resilience to climate-change threats in the western USA based on historical forest structure. My work focuses on evaluating climate change impacts, and updating conservation strategies to reduce climate-related risks.  So, I was particularly interested in a recent paper by Baker and Williams in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (2015) that draws upon LANDFIRE maps of ponderosa pine and dry mixed conifer forest. This paper provides interesting food for thought related to the role of small trees in conferring resilience to fire, insects, and drought. Thinking through all of these interactions can help us update forest management for climate change.

In another avian application, Gnass Giese et al. used LANDFIRE EVT to evaluate whether bird distributions across a wide range of sites in the Great Lakes region show a “human footprint.” The team demonstrates how bird survey data and land use information can be crafted into a bird-based index of ecological condition for the region, noting that while other datasets mapped vegetation at finer resolution. 
Sarah Hagen, Spatial Analyst
To quantify and identify priority areas for prescribed fire, the Wisconsin Fire Needs Assessment combines the information for fire dependent vegetation with additional spatial data sets to assess the benefits, effort, and challenges associated with using prescribed fire. LF data were used because they include both public and private lands; they are publicly available, making the methods easy to replicate for other states; and the assessment can be updated with future versions of LF data. Vegetation descriptions that included historical mean fire return intervals were an important part of the analysis.
The Illinois Fire Council developed the state's fire needs assessment to promote and expand the use of prescribed fire. This is the first systematic report in Illinois to document the number of acres burned annually and identify how many need to burn in order to promote ecosystem health. It provides a call to action for land managers, legislators and the general public. Products used: BpS, EVT, and MFRI were foundational resources. Watch the webinar video.
I'm reading Richard Manning's 1997 book Grassland: The History, Biology, Politics and Promise of the American Prairie, and recommend it, especially if you haven't thought about grasslands the way that I do -- as THE coolest ecosystems. One of the many quotes that speak to me is this: "Once covered with tall-grass prairie and a few fingers of oak savannahs, [Iowa] now holds less than one half of one percent of its original habitat. By comparison, the amount of old-growth forest remaining in the Pacific Northwest--the region where our most vociferous environmental battles rage--makes that region positively pristine." [LANDFIRE note: read Sarah's blog No Place Else I'd Rather Be for more context.]




 Related Resources