Collaborative Planning Fosters Multiple-benefit Restoration Projects on the Sacramento River.

Conservation Biology
2009
Gregory H. Golet, Beverley Anderson, Ryan A. Luster, Gregg Werner.
Publisher N/A
SourceGregory H. Golet
Volume / Issue23 (6)
Pages1634-1637
Total Pages N/A
Article Link
ISBN N/A
DOI10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01348.x
Editor(s) N/A
Conference / Book Title N/A
Flag N/A
TagsRestoration, Sacramento River
Other N/A
Conference Title N/A
Conference Date N/A
Publication Date9-Dec
Article Date N/A
GS Citation4
AbstractWe were pleased that Buckley and Crone (2008) highlight the importance of understanding societal impacts of restoration in their article entitled ñNegative Off-Site Impacts of Ecological Restoration: Understanding and Addressing the Conflict.î This is an important issue that deserves attention in the conservation science literature. We were disappointed, however, in their characterization of how these issues are being dealt with in the context of Sacramento River restoration efforts. Their article overlooks important steps that have been taken over the past two decades to deal with the concerns of agricultural landowners and local communities. They use the Sacramento River as an example of where unaddressed conflicts have shut down restoration efforts. Yet in reality, this is an area where cutting-edge science and stakeholder engagement practices have supported implementation of some of the most progressive river restoration projects ever undertaken. Although Sacramento River riparian restoration has faced some local opposition, the stakeholder engagement forums in the area have fostered a suite of multiple-benefit projects that simultaneously benefit society and the ecosystem.
Created: 12/14/2017 10:29 AM (ET)
Modified: 12/14/2017 10:29 AM (ET)
“” “”