| Publisher | Springer Nature |
| Source | Web of Science |
| Volume / Issue | 7 |
| Pages |
N/A
|
| Total Pages | 9 pages |
| Article Link |
N/A
|
| PDF Link |
N/A
|
| ISBN |
N/A
|
| DOI | doi.org/10.1038/srep43131 |
| Editor(s) |
N/A
|
| Conference / Book Title |
N/A
|
| Flag |
N/A
|
| Tags | community ecology; conservation biology; population dynamics |
| Other |
N/A
|
| Conference Title |
N/A
|
| Conference Date |
N/A
|
| Publication Date | February 21, 2017 |
| Article Date | 43131 |
| GS Citation |
N/A
|
| Abstract | What did coral reef ecosystems look like before human impacts became pervasive? Early efforts to reconstruct baselines resulted in the controversial suggestion that pristine coral reefs have inverted trophic pyramids, with disproportionally large top predator biomass. The validity of the coral reef inverted trophic pyramid has been questioned, but until now, was not resolved empirically. We use data from an eight-year tag-recapture program with spatially explicit, capture-recapture models to re-examine the population size and density of a key top predator at Palmyra atoll, the same location that inspired the idea of inverted trophic biomass pyramids in coral reef ecosystems. Given that animal movement is suspected to have significantly biased early biomass estimates of highly mobile top predators, we focused our reassessment on the most mobile and most abundant predator at Palmyra, the grey reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos). We estimated a density of 21.3 (95% CI 17.8, 24.7) grey reef sharks/km2, which is an order of magnitude lower than the estimates that suggested an inverted trophic pyramid. Our results indicate that the trophic structure of an unexploited reef fish community is not inverted, and that even healthy top predator populations may be considerably smaller, and more precarious, than previously thought. |
Created: 12/14/2017 10:30 AM (ET)
Modified: 11/20/2018 10:45 AM (ET)